Barreras Institucionales para la Gobernanza Digital en Ecuador: Evidencia desde la Cuarta Revolución Industrial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51915/ret.407Palabras clave:
gobierno electrónico, Cambio Institucional, interoperabilidad, disparidades regionales, capacidad institucionalResumen
Este estudio analiza los desafíos institucionales que obstaculizan la transformación digital del sector público en Ecuador, en el contexto de la Cuarta Revolución Industrial. Se aplicó una metodología cualitativa, descriptiva y documental, siguiendo las directrices del protocolo PRISMA. De 161 fuentes revisadas, 25 documentos cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión y se aplicó un cuestionario tipo Likert a 24 expertos entre académicos, funcionarios y técnicos. Los hallazgos se organizaron en cinco dimensiones: interoperabilidad institucional, marco regulatorio, gobernanza digital, capacidades institucionales y equidad territorial. Se identifican problemas como la escasa coordinación entre plataformas estatales, limitada operatividad local y brechas territoriales en el acceso a servicios digitales. El estudio concluye que el gobierno digital requiere una transformación estructural más allá de lo tecnológico. Se propone una estrategia multinivel que combine interoperabilidad, inversión sostenida, fortalecimiento institucional y participación ciudadana. Aporta una visión contextualizada e integral, útil para el diseño de políticas públicas digitales inclusivas en países en desarrollo.
Descargas
Estadísticas globales ℹ️
|
0
Visualizaciones
|
0
Descargas
|
|
0
Total
|
|
Citas
Adam, I. & Fazekas, M. (2021) ‘Are Emerging Technologies Helping Win the Fight against Corruption? A Review of the State of Evidence’, Government Information Quarterly, 38(4), p. 101568. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101568.
Aguerre, C. (2023) ‘Open Government, Civic Tech and Digital Platforms in Latin America: A Regional Perspective’, Information Systems Journal, 33(1), pp. 35–50. doi: 10.1111/isj.12360.
Anthopoulos, L., Janssen, M. & Weerakkody, V. (2022) ‘Conceptualizing Smart Government: A Framework for Understanding the Role of ICT in Public Sector Transformation’, Information Systems Frontiers, 24(2), pp. 269–284. doi: 10.1007/s10796-022-10229-2.
Aranda, D., Martínez, L. & Rodríguez, A. (2022) ‘Vocational Training and Industry 4.0 in Spain: Challenges and Opportunities’, European Journal of Education, 57(1), pp. 85–102.
Ashcroft, R., Donahue, P., Silvius, H. & Mofina, A. (2024) ‘Scoping Review of Social Workers’ Professional Roles in Primary Healthcare Settings’, BMJ Open, 14(1), p. e077654. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077654.
Asamblea Nacional del Ecuador (2021) Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales. Registro Oficial Suplemento No. 459.
Asamblea Nacional del Ecuador (2023a) Ley Orgánica de Ciberseguridad. Registro Oficial Suplemento No. 489.
Asamblea Nacional del Ecuador (2023b) Ley Orgánica de Gobierno Digital. Registro Oficial Suplemento No. 450.
Atobishi, T., Abu Bakir, S.M. & Nosratabadi, S. (2024) ‘How Do Digital Capabilities Affect Organizational Performance in the Public Sector? The Mediating Role of the Organizational Agility’, Administrative Sciences, 14(37). doi: 10.3390/admsci14030037.
Baum, D., Yagüe-Blanco, J.L. & Escobar, J. (2021) ‘Capacity development strategy empowering the digitalization of rural territories in Latin America’, Information Technology for Development, 27(4), pp. 741–759. doi: 10.1080/02681102.2021.1886922.
Bharosa, N. & Janowski, T. (2024) ‘The GovTech challenge – GovTech and public value creation’, in Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (DGO 2024), Taipei, Taiwan, 11–14 June, pp. 1–3. ACM. doi: 10.1145/3657054.3659125.
Breaugh, J., Rackwitz, M., Hammerschmid, G., Nõmmik, S., Bello, B., Boon, J., Van Doninck, D., Downe, J. & Randma-Liiv, T. (2023) ‘Deconstructing complexity: A comparative study of government collaboration in national digital platforms and smart city networks in Europe’, Public Policy and Administration, 0(0). doi: 10.1177/09520767231169401.
Cabrera-Barona, P. & Cisneros, P. (2021) ‘Explaining the effectiveness of forest and water governance in Ecuador: The role of policy networks and trust’, Environmental Science & Policy, 120, pp. 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.01.009.
CAF – Development Bank of Latin America and the Caribbean (2025) Connectivity, inclusion and digital transformation in Latin America and the Caribbean. Available at: https://www.caf.com/media/4674393/impactocaf-connectivity-and-digital-transformation-full-report.pdf (Accessed: 30 July 2025).
CAF y Oxford Insights (2024) Índice GovTech 2024: Ecosistemas digitales para una mejor gobernanza. Caracas: CAF. Available at: https://www.caf.com/es/actualidad/publicaciones/2024/indice-govtech-2024/ (Accessed: 30 July 2025).
CAF y Oxford Insights (2024) Índice GovTech 2024: Una mirada regional al avance de los gobiernos digitales en América Latina. Caracas: CAF. Available at: https://scioteca.caf.com/handle/123456789/2302 (Accessed: 30 July 2025).
CEPAL (Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe) (2023) Economía digital para América Latina y el Caribe – Diagnóstico de país: Ecuador. Santiago: Naciones Unidas.
Chauhan, A., Duggal, M., Kankaria, A., Gupta, V. & Kumar, R. (2025) ‘Exploring Patient and Health Care Provider Perspectives on Diabetic Retinopathy Screening in India: A Qualitative Study’, Scientific Reports, 15, p. 8251. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55289-w.
Cibian, Ș., Drăgan, M., Fierăscu, S.I., Rușitoru, I. & Beserman, E. (2022) A national study on digital inclusion and exclusion in Romania. Făgăraș Research Institute. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373842156_A_National_Study_on_Digital_Inclusion_and_Exclusion_in_Romania_2022 (Accessed: 30 July 2025).
Clark, P. & Rosales, A. (2023) ‘Broadened embedded autonomy and Latin America’s subnational digital divide: Lessons from Ecuador’, Policy and Society, 42(1), pp. 105–122. doi: 10.1093/polsoc/puad001.
Dedovic, A. & Homburg, V. (2024) ‘Cross-Border Digital Public Services in the European Union: A Systematic Literature Review’, Government Information Quarterly, 41(1), p. 101806. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2023.101806.
Dirección Nacional de Registro de Datos Públicos (DINARP) (2024) Cerca de 130 GAD conocieron los servicios de interoperabilidad de la DINARP, 11 July. Available at: https://www.registrospublicos.gob.ec/cerca-de-130-gad-conocieron-los-servicios-de-interoperabilidad-de-la-dinarp/ (Accessed: 30 July 2025).
Edelmann, N. & Virkar, S. (2023) ‘The Impact of Sustainability on Co-Creation of Digital Public Services’, Administrative Sciences, 13(2), p. 43. doi: 10.3390/admsci13020043.
Gigova, A. (2020) ‘Digital Transformation and Regional Disparities: Challenges for Inclusive E-Government’, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 878, p. 012076. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/878/1/012076.
Golob, U., Podnar, K. & Elving, W.J.L. (2024) ‘European Citizenship and Digitalization: Institutional Roles in Reshaping Governance’, Telecommunications Policy, 48(2), p. 102648. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102648.
Grossi, G. & Argento, D. (2022) ‘Digitalization and Public Sector Accountability: A Review of Emerging Issues’, Financial Accountability & Management, 38(4), pp. 565–583.
Gualavisí, A. (2024) ‘Digital Welfare State in Ecuador: Citizen Datafication and Machine Learning in the Construction and Management of Poverty’, Cuhso. doi: 10.7770/cuhso-v34n1-art644.
Hien, B.N. (2024) ‘Digital empowerment in Vietnam: How public sector innovation boosts citizen satisfaction’, Archives of Science, 74(2), pp. 124–132. doi: 10.62227/aas/74218.
Iqbal, M.S., Rahim, Z.A. & Ohshima, N. (2023) ‘A TRIZ-Informed Intervention Framework for Sustainable 4IR Adoption in Malaysian Manufacturing and Related Services (MRS) Industries’, Applied Sciences and Engineering Progress, 50(1). doi: 10.37934/araseet.50.1.203219.
Iverson, D., Smith, L. & Lee, H. (2024) ‘A Rapid Systematic Review of the Effect of Health Education Interventions on Health Outcomes’, PLOS Global Public Health, 2(4), p. e0001832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001832.
Jiang, Y., Li, J. & Wang, M. (2023) ‘Natural Language Processing in Public Administration: A Systematic Review’, Applied Sciences, 13(4), p. 12346. doi: 10.3390/app1312346.
Kuo‐Hsun, J. (2024) ‘Digital Divide, Global’, The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1002/9781405165518.wbeos0563.pub2.
Lincoln, Y.S. & Guba, E.G. (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Lněnička, M. & Máchová, R. (2022) ‘A Theoretical Framework to Evaluate ICT Disparities and Digital Divides: Challenges and Implications for E-Government Development’, Government Information Quarterly, 39(3), p. 101724.
Long, C., Zhang, J. & Liu, W. (2021) ‘A Big Data Framework for E-Government in Industry 4.0’, Government Information Quarterly, 38(3), p. 101585.
Loor, I. & Rivadeneira, L. (2024) ‘Exploring Local Challenges through the Lens of E-Government in Manabí, Ecuador’, ICEDEG. doi: 10.1109/ICEDEG61611.2024.10702091.
Manda, M.I. (2021) ‘Leadership and Trust in Smart Governance: A Conceptual Discussion’, in Proceedings of the International Conference on E-Government.
Michalik, M. (2022) ‘Smart Cities and Innovations: Addressing User Acceptance with Virtual Reality and Urban Platforms’, IET Smart Cities, 4(4), pp. 257–264. doi: 10.1049/smc2.12051.
Morales, V. & Robalino-Lopez, A. (2020) ‘Framework for the Evaluation of Internet Development: Case Study—Application of Internet Universality Indicators in Ecuador’, ICEDEG 2020. doi: 10.1109/ICEDEG48599.2020.9096781.
Morte-Nadal, T. & Esteban-Navarro, M.Á. (2025) ‘Recommendations for Digital Inclusion in the Use of Digital Public Services in Spain’, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, p. 273. doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-02742-3.
Nazareno, M.D.O. de L. (2023) ‘DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION AS A FACTOR OF CHANGE IN ECUADOR’S PRODUCTIVE MATRIX’, IJRDO - Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 9(8), pp. 63–79. doi: 10.53555/sshr.v9i8.5809.
Neamțu, B. & Hossu, C. (2024) ‘Experiential Learning in Public Administration: From Theory to Practice’, Journal of Public Affairs Education, 30(1), pp. 97–111.
Nel, D. (2020) ‘Risk in ICT Public-Private Partnerships: Lessons from South Africa’, Computer Law & Security Review, 36, p. 105388.
OECD & CAF (2023) Digital Government Review of Latin America and the Caribbean. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2023/09/digital-government-review-of-latin-america-and-the-caribbean_75a4be05/29f32e64-en.pdf (Accessed: 30 July 2025).
OECD (2023) OECD Digital Government Index: Enhancing the digital transformation of the public sector. OECD Publishing. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2024/01/2023-oecd-digital-government-index_b11e8e8e/1a89ed5e-en.pdf (Accessed: 30 July 2025).
Ordoñez, S., Toledo, D. & Campoverde, M. (2021) ‘Reflections on E-Government and Citizen Participation in Ecuador’, Revista Eurolatinoamericana de Derecho Administrativo. doi: 10.14409/REDOEDA.V8I1.9562.
Palacin, C., Del Canto, A. & Aponte, M. (2021) ‘Reframing E-Participation for the SDGs: A Global Perspective’, Proceedings of the United Nations E-Government Survey Workshop.
Rojas Cangahuala, G., Chura Alegre, M., López Orozco, G. & Pinto Díaz, G. (2025) ‘Gobierno digital y la gestión pública: temáticas, influencias y colaboraciones internacionales’, Revista Venezolana De Gerencia, 30(109), pp. 247–268. doi: 10.52080/rvgluz.30.109.16.
Rojas, R., Tupia, M. & Bruzza, M. (2023) ‘An Empirical Model for Measuring Quality and Maturity of Interoperability of E-Government Solutions: Case Study—Public Entities Related to Tourism, Hospitality, and Gastronomy in Ecuador’, Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-0337-5_4.
Roxas, B. (2024) ‘E-governance and sustainable human development in Asia: a dynamic institutional path perspective’, Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies. doi: 10.1108/jabes-02-2024-0076.
Santini, J.F., Sacco Capurro, F., Rogger, D., Lundy, T., Kim, G., de León Miranda, J., Cocciolo, S. & Casanova, C. (2024) Data for Better Governance: Building Government Analytics Ecosystems in Latin America and the Caribbean. World Bank Flagship Publication No. 42413. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
Sempértegui, A. & Báez, M. (2023) ‘Ontological Conflicts in the Plurinational State of Bolivia: Resistance to Digitalization and Indigenous Worldviews’, Latin American Research Review, 58(3), pp. 389–402. doi: 10.1017/lar.2023.33.
Stratu-Strelet, D., Gil-Gómez, H., Oltra-Badenes, R. & Guerola-Navarro, V. (2023) ‘Exploring the links between democracy and digital transformation in developing Latin America countries: Building a democracy consolidation theory’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 195, p. 122742. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122742.
Suing, A., Ordóñez, K. & Lomas, P. (2023) ‘Verification of the Public Discourse and Accountability of Mayors on Local TV: The Case of Ecuador’, Studies in Media and Communication. doi: 10.11114/smc.v11i4.5912.
Tan, W., Choy, M. & Lim, B. (2023) ‘Blockchain-Based Digital Credentials and the European Blockchain Services Infrastructure’, Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 7(4), p. 79.
Taqi, H.M., Nayeem, I., Bari, A.B.M.M., Anam, M.Z. & Ali, S.M. (2025) ‘Addressing Challenges to Cloud Manufacturing in Industry 4.0 Environment Using an Integrated Approach: Implications for Sustainability’, Green Technologies and Sustainability, 3(3), p. 100166. doi: 10.1016/j.gretes.2024.100166.
UN DESA (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs) (2024) E-Government Survey 2024: Accelerating Digital Transformation for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations. Available at: https://publicadministration.un.org/en/egovkb (Accessed: 30 July 2025).
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2024) United Nations E-Government Survey 2024: Accelerating digital transformation for sustainable development (with the addendum on Artificial Intelligence). United Nations. Available at: https://publicadministration.un.org/en/publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/ (Accessed: 30 July 2025).
Villao, D., Vera, G., Duque, V. & Mazón, L. (2023) ‘Opportunities and Challenges of Digital Transformation in the Public Sector: The Case of Ecuador’, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-37117-2_1.
World Bank (2024) Digital Economy Assessment: Ecuador. World Bank Group. Available at: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099957201262484042/pdf/IDU148619f7c191381405618db3115106df826f9.pdf (Accessed: 30 July 2025).
Zeleti, F.A., Ojo, A. & Curry, E. (2021) ‘Digital Technology Governance in Tax Administration: Toward a Smart Tax Administration Framework’, ACM Digital Government: Research and Practice, 2(3), p. 23.
Zhang, X. & Sahli, M. (2024) ‘Social Media and Trust in Public Administration: A Cross-Country Perspective’, Government Information Quarterly, 41(1), p. 101779. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2024.101779
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Revista Española de la Transparencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0.
La Revista Española de la Transparencia apuesta por el acceso gratuito y uso sin restricciones a su información y recursos digitales. La política de acceso abierto se materializa en:
- Acceso gratuito, libre y universal.
- Los autores y la Revista conceden a cualquier usuario potencial el derecho a utilizar, copiar o distribuir el contenido de manera ilimitada e irrevocable, con la única condición de reconocer la autoría.
- Los documentos electrónicos correspondientes al contenido de la Revista se incluyen en formato digital para permitir su acceso libre.
