Anti-Fraud Agencies: effective or not? a study of the Balearic and Valencian cases
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51915/ret.450Keywords:
anti-corruption agencies, whistleblowing, effectiveness, public integrity, corruptionAbstract
This article examines the actual effectiveness of regional anti-corruption agencies in Spain through a comparative analysis of two paradigmatic cases: the Valencian Anti-Fraud Agency (AVAF) and the now-defunct Office for the Prevention and Fight against Corruption of the Balearic Islands (OIAB). Using a qualitative methodology based on the systematic review of their institutional reports from 2020 to 2024, three key indicators—complaints received, investigations initiated, and investigations concluded—are reconstructed to identify performance patterns, year-to-year variations, and potential signs of institutional fragility. The analysis contrasts with international standards on independence and with extensive specialized literature. The results reveal divergent trajectories: while the OIAB appears to maintain a high investigative resolution capacity until its closure, AVAF shows a steady increase in complaints alongside a decline in investigative activity. These findings allow us to draw broader conclusions suggesting that the effectiveness of such agencies does not depend solely on their legal design, but also on exogenous factors.
Downloads
Global Statistics ℹ️
|
0
Views
|
0
Downloads
|
|
0
Total
|
|
References
BENÍTEZ PALMA, E. 2017. “La convivencia entre los Órganos de Control Externo (OCEx) y las Agencias Autonómicas de Prevención y Lucha contra la Corrupción”. Auditoría Pública (69), pp. 9-18.
BENÍTEZ PALMA, E. 2018. “El control externo y el whistleblowing (canales de denuncia)”. Revista española de control externo, 20(59), pp. 11-42.
CAPDEFERRO, O. 2020. “The Role of the Anti-Fraud Office of Catalonia in the Fight against Corruption in the Catalan Public Sector. Analysis and Suggestions for Reform to Mark Its 10th Anniversary”. Rev. Catalana Dret Pub., 60, 35. https://doi.org/10.2436/rcdp.i60.2020.3413
CAPDEFERRO, O. 2023. “La autoridad independiente de protección de las personas que informen sobre infracciones normativas”. Canales de información y protección del denunciante en las Administraciones locales: estudios sobre la Ley 2-2023. Fundación Democracia y Gobierno Local. pp. 211-242.
CHETTY, J., y PILLAY, P. 2017. “Independence of anti corruption agencies: a comparative study of South Africa and India”. African Journal of Public Affairs, 9(8), pp. 105-120.
CLEMENTE-GARCÍA, T. 2022. “Las agencias de prevención y lucha contra el fraude y la corrupción en la Agenda 2030 de las Naciones Unidas: Un posible modelo, la Agencia Valenciana Antifraude (AVAF)”. En ABAD ALCALÁ, L y SERRANO MAÍLLO, M. I. (Dirs.), La integridad en la administración: Contratación pública y lucha contra la corrupción. Tirant lo Blanch, pp. 95-114
DE SOUSA, L. 2010. “Anti-corruption agencies: between empowerment and irrelevance”. Crime, law and social change, 53(1), pp. 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-009-9211-3
FERNÁNDEZ AJENJO, J. A. 2019. “Problemas y soluciones frente al uso populista del Estado de Derecho: Agencias anticorrupción y servicios de coordinación antifraude”. Revista internacional de transparencia e integridad, (9) pp. 1-11
FERNÁNDEZ-GONZÁLEZ, M. C. 2025. Análisis criminológico de la persona denunciante de corrupción: especial referencia a la Comunidad Valenciana. Tirant lo Blanch.
FERNÁNDEZ-GONZÁLEZ, M. C.; y VEGA-FELGUEROSO, J. 2025. “La confidencialidad de la protección al denunciante versus la transparencia de las instituciones”. En ALVES, L. (Dir.) Instrumentos de gobernanza pública. Presente y futuro. Colex. pp. 129-150
FERNÁNDEZ-I-MARÍN, X., KNILL, C., STEINBACHER, C., y STEINEBACH, Y. 2024. “Bureaucratic quality and the gap between implementation burden and administrative capacities”. American Political Science Review, 118(3), pp. 1240-1260. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055423001090
FRIDRICZEWSKI, V.; y RODRÍGUEZ GARCÍA, N. 2023. En busca de estrategias 360 anticorrupción. Tirant lo Blanch.
HAMEDUDDIN, T., y ENGBERS, T. 2022. “Leadership and public service motivation: a systematic synthesis”. International Public Management Journal, 25(1), pp. 86-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2021.1884150
HUSSMANN, K., y HECHLER, H. 2008. “Anti-corruption policy making in practice: Implications for implementing UNCAC”. U4 Brief, 2008(1).
JALONEN, H. 2025. “A complexity theory perspective on politico-administrative systems: Insights from a systematic literature review”. International Public Management Journal, 28(1), pp. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2024.2333382
KNILL, C., STEINEBACH, Y.; y ZINK, D. 2024. “How policy growth affects policy implementation: bureaucratic overload and policy triage”. Journal of European Public Policy, 31(2), pp. 324-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2158208
KWON, J. 2023. “Misconduct Mismanagement: Independent Oversight, Accountability, and the Rule of Law” (Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada).
LEÓN ALAPONT, J. 2024. “Canales de denuncia externos y protección del informante: una breve comparación entre los sistemas español (A.A.I.) e italiano (ANAC)”. Revista General de Derecho Penal, 42, pp. 1-53
LOURENÇO, R. P. 2023. “Government transparency: Monitoring public policy accumulation and administrative overload”. Government Information Quarterly, 40(1), 101762, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101762
MAJONE, G. 1997. “From the positive to the regulatory state: Causes and consequences of changes in the mode of governance”. Journal of Public Policy, 17(2), pp. 139–167.
MUNGIU-PIPPIDI, A. 2015. “The Quest for Good Governance: How Societies Develop Control of Corruption”. Cambridge University Press.
OECD. 2008. Specialised anti-corruption institutions: Review of models. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
OKSANA, H; BEKE, M; WYNARSKI, J y SLOT, B. 2023. Handbook of good practices in the fight against corruption. European Comission.
PONCE SOLÉ, J. 2017. “Las agencias anticorrupción. Una propuesta de lista de comprobación de la calidad de su diseño normativo”. Revista internacional de transparencia e integridad, 3, pp. 1-13.
RODRÍGUEZ-FLORES, J. R. S. 2020. “Aquellos días, estas realidades”. interdisciplinARS, (1), 30-30.
SANTIVAÑEZ VIVANCO, M. 2013. “Agencias anticorrupción e independencia: ¿augures o arúspices? Una hoja de ruta para Latinoamérica”. Revista del CLAD Reforma y democracia, (56), pp. 59-98.
SCHEDLER, A., DIAMOND, L. J.; y PLATTNER, M. F. 1999. “The self-restraining state: power and accountability in new democracies”. Lynne Rienner Publishers, pp. 217-226.
SCOTT, C. 2004. “Regulation in the age of governance: The rise of the post-regulatory state”. En J. JORDANA y D. LEVI-FAUR (Eds.), The politics of regulation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
TATE, C. N., y VALLINDER, T. 1995. The global expansion of judicial power. New York University Press.
VAQUERO, A., LAGO, S., CADAVAL, M. D., y SÁNCHEZ, P. 2024. “La dinámica de inversión regional en España: un estudio comparativo de las Comunidades Autónomas”. Investigaciones Regionales, vol. 64. https://doi.org/10.38191/IIRR-JORR.24.065
VAQUERO, A., y CADAVAL, M. 2024. “Modelos y resultados de los organismos territoriales contra la corrupción pública en España ¿Qué lecciones podemos aprender?” Revista española de la transparencia, (20). https://doi.org/10.51915/ret.358 pp. 125-155.
WOOD, A. K., y LEWIS, D. E. 2017. “Agency performance challenges and agency politicization”. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(4), 581-595. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mux014
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Spanish Journal of Transparency

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Spanish Journal of Transparency is committed to free access and unrestricted use of its information and digital resources. The open access policy is materialized in:
- Free, free and universal access.
- The authors and the Journal grant any potential user the right to use, copy or distribute the content in an unlimited and irrevocable manner, with the sole condition of recognizing the authorship.
- The electronic documents corresponding to the content of the Journal are included in digital format to allow free access.







